Details from NamUs (the time in the description below is disputed):
21-year-old Lillian Rochelle Holmes went missing in Pasadena. California on 3/22/1984 (Thursday).
Lillian was last seen by her father when she left her Pasadena home at approximately 6:30 am on her way to start a new job demonstrating products at Robinsons in the Santa Anita Mall located in Arcadia, CA.
Lillian was last seen boarding an RTD bus in Pasadena carrying a blue dress over her shoulder. Lillian was never seen or heard from again.
It is believed that Lillian never made it to the new job at the mall but it is unknown where exactly she vanished along her journey between her home and the mall.
Missing Person: Lillian Rochelle Holmes
Last-contact date: March 22nd, 1984 (Thursday) — NamUs says she was seen at 630AM, another source says noon to 1 PM
The area where the MP was last seen: Pasadena, California, at Lake Avenue and Rio Grande Street
Link to government source: NamUs MP14475
VITAL DETAILS
Ethnicity: Black (described as a light-skinned mulatto)
Sex: Female
Age at time of disappearance: 21 years old
Birthdate: January 23rd, 1963
Hair: Brown
Eyes: Hazel
Scar: None indicated
Height/weight: 5’2″ to 5’5″ and 105 to 120 pounds
BMI*: Lillian Rochelle Holmes was in the normal range for BMI.
Tattoos: Lillian Rochelle Holmes did not have any tattoos associated with her profiles. If you know that the missing person did have tattoos, then please post a remark at the end of this blog post on the matter.
By: Shane Lambert
Original time of writing: March 22nd, 2021
Lillian Rochelle Holmes was last heard from on Thursday, March 22nd, 1984, when she was 21 years of age. This individual disappeared during her commute on what was her first day at a new job, according to the NamUs description. She has been missing for about 42 years as of 2026.
The following is the best description of her route that I could construct: (1) Leaves home at 6:30 AM; (2) goes to a laundromat at some point; (3) boards a bus between noon and 1 PM at the Rio Grande and Lake intersection in Pasadena; (4) rides this bus, presumably toward work at Santa Anita Fashion Park; (5) presumably exits the bus voluntarily near her place of work; (6) disappears somewhere between this bus stop and her new job at Robinson’s in the mall.
There are inferential leaps involved in constructing this, but I think they are reasonable.
What stands out with this case to me was the fact that it was her first day at a new job. I considered the possibility that she was not entirely familiar with her commute. However, she did have a long-term association with Pasadena. When I researched modern routes, the trip between Pasadena and the mall should not have been complicated for Lillian. Evidently, things did not go as planned.
Normally, with missing people who disappear during their commutes, I consider a stalker who is familiar with the MP’s patterns. I think a commute is a semi-predictable route and a pattern that a stalker could learn over time. But with a first-day commute, the stalker-that-knew-her is less likely, in my opinion.
I found her in high school yearbooks from Pasadena in what would have been earlier times of her life. It’s clear that she lived in the area for at least seven years prior to disappearing. She is in the 1978 Pasadena High School yearbook as a freshman. That picture is below, but the one at the top of this article is from closer to the time she disappeared.
A search for journalism regarding this case failed when I used my membership at Newspapers.com (2021; can be double-checked). However, she was definitely covered somewhere, as NamUs included an uncredited newspaper article in their profile. Apparently, this newspaper article wasn’t in the newspapers that are included in the Newspaper.com database at the time of this article’s original research.
The missing person had a blue dress in her possession that she had just gotten from the laundromat. The location of this laundromat would be interesting to learn. My best guess is that she was at the current location of Super Wash Coin Laundromat, which would only be a two-minute walk from the intersection where she was last seen boarding a bus.
This laundromat exists in modern times. Whether it existed in 1984, or whether a laundromat under a different name did, is a matter that I looked at. I did find a piece of circumstantial evidence supporting that a laundromat could have existed in 1984 at 1379 N. Lake Avenue in Pasadena.
Back in 2005, someone applied for a permit to modify a laundromat that already existed at that location. The documentation is online at this link as of September 2026. I snipped it in case it disappears.
The snippet below proves that there was an existing coin-laundry business at 1379 N. Lake Avenue in very early 2005. I would think a business would not be remodelled until it is well used, but that is a bit of conjecture. It’s only fair to say that Lillian Holmes might have been at this laundromat ahead of boarding the bus at the nearby street corner.
The journalism indicates that she was last seen later in the day than what the NamUs description states. According to NamUs, Lillian was last seen by her father. However, she was reportedly seen getting on a bus. Perhaps some doubt this sighting, as, in fact, the father’s would be more credible.
Lake Avenue and Rio Grande Street, by the most efficient modern route, would be 7.1 miles away from the mall where I think she was starting to work.
So, I think her day likely involved leaving home at 630AM, going to the cleaners, perhaps going for lunch, and then taking the bus from the laundromat to the mall where she was to start her job. The following clippings are advertisements from the Robinson’s store that, I think, she was going to work at. One of them may even have been the job that Lillian applied to, as the timing is about right. The addresses in the advertisements would suggest that she was going to work at Santa Anita Fashion Park, which is now known as The Shops at Santa Anita. A contemporary address for the mall would be 400 S. Baldwin Avenue.
I’m picturing an abduction in this case because of how attractive Lillian was and the fact that I think she was showing up for work eager to make a good first impression in the type of job where looks mattered to the employer. Sales Associate or Product Display positions in department stores usually feature well-dressed and attractive women. That would also attract a lot of attention her way during her commute. I don’t think she does laundry for work in preparation to run off.
Abduction on a city bus is hard to do with a grown adult like Lillian. A commotion would create witnesses. So if she got on the bus, as the witness reported, then Lillian got off the bus. The same could be said inside the mall. In my opinion, the part of her commute where she was most vulnerable would be the mall parking lot. That is my presumptive area of interest for where she might have been abducted, but there doesn’t seem to be much to go on.
Comparisons to Other Cases
Along these lines, a similar case would be that of Cindy Lee Mellin. She was a department store employee who was practically known to have been abducted in the parking lot of the mall where she worked. In Mellin’s case, it happened during her commute as well, but after her shift. Mellin’s disappearance was 14 years earlier, in 1970, and about 80 miles away in Ventura. Mellin was 19, and she was female. That’s pretty close to the same demographics as Holmes.
These cases may be unrelated, but if you agree that the mall parking lot was the most dangerous part of Lillian’s commute, then they do have some interesting similarities. If either missing person is to be found, then certainly a lot of work remains to be done. As researched with the time I had, Holmes is a true vanishing: there’s no significant clue as to what happened to her.
Author: Shane Lambert (UncoolNegated on Websleuths)
All articles are subject to editing after the original posting.
If you like this blog, then you can join the affiliated Facebook group: MPC Facebook Group
Website hashtag: #MPCSL
Leave a Reply